#Fediblock @xander @cryo.icu
Single user instance spamming the fediblock tag and encouraging further spam on it
fediblock, meta
@schratze Additionally boosting a comment that tries to justify consent violations by arguing that the spec allows it, to get an idea of the general amount of respect they have for personal boundaries
fedi drama?
@joepie91 I don't get it. What's the problem with a read-only catch-all ActivityPub server?
re: fedi drama?
@lambda The problem is not technical, the problem is that it is a consent violation on multiple levels. It enables anonymous following (a significant harassment vector), and also replicates follower-only posts. It is essentially deliberately bypassing the visibility/privacy controls placed on posts by their authors.
This is one of those "just because you *can* build it, doesn't mean you should" things.
