@schratze Honestly this is one of the biggest issues I have with most package management systems - there's "distro maintainers packaging software" and then there's "third-party packages" and there's usually a *huge* wall between them in terms of tooling, and quality of integration, and so on, where the moment you use the latter, reliability goes to shit.

And then flatpaks/appimages/snaps/etc. try to "fix" that by introducing a new packaging format that basically just vendors all the dependencies, and is *still* a completely separate system from the *actual* system package manager, so the wall is still there...

And honestly Nix/Guix are the only ones I've seen that have a convincing answer to this problem by erasing the wall between those two categories on a structural level, and I *hate* that this model is not more widely adopted by other distros and package managers. I don't even care if it's Nix/Guix themselves being used. But the solution is just left on the table...

Grumble