@rysiek@mastodon.technology @evelyn@misskey.bubbletea.dev "Enforcement could be better" is grossly understating the problem, and frankly an incredibly privileged take. You are assuming equitable access to legal recourse where there is none *and there won't be in the future either*.

This is not something you can fix by throwing a bit more effort at it or hotpatching it, it is *fundamentally broken* for anybody who isn't a wealthy white guy, by design. It will never work. It *cannot* work. It does not work today. It flat-out does not actually do the thing you are claiming copyleft is useful for.

And that's not even considering that you don't seem to have spent a second considering what the broader implications of "abolishing copyright" are, or how that relates to the public commons and what can fall under it.

Guess what? If there's no copyright, there's also nothing preventing you from just using what corporations built. By which point, what's the point of FOSS licensing again? Why is "legal recourse" needed again, if the concept of "proprietary software" ceases to exist entirely?

Again: it is an incredibly privileged take to assume that "legal recourse" is the be-all-end-all of conflict resolution, *especially* where it concerns the public interest. If this is something that you cannot accept or understand, then any further discussion of the topic is pointless, and I have no interest in continuing it.