@church ah yikes, should've archived it.. good thing the page was still open on my desktop so will add some screenshots to the thread

@f0x when reading that thread i considered screenshotting it, but realised you’d probably already done so. i was right! :p

@kim well i almost didn't! once again reminded I should throw shit through an archiver before tooting an expose :")

@f0x you could set up a bot that follows your RSS feed an archives them 🤔

@kim actually i keep forgetting to bring back the thing that blocks user rss feeds :") way too easy to scrape

@f0x @kim it's so nice of them to have all these discussions in public 🌍

@f0x here is likely how the knowledge of this tool might have spread https://www.cjr.org/analysis/journalists-want-to-recreate-twitter-on-mastodon-mastodon-is-not-into-it.php

(in the link attached to the 'about forty-five “instances” are blocking' text)

@host once again confirming the danger such journalists pose, repeating shit without knowing or caring about context

@f0x the "context" part hurts the most, as I would understand this to be the basis of what journalism entails.

@host @f0x jesus fucking christ. ty for linking that. socrates was looking out for their instance, idk why mathew couldntve just anonymized their post. fuck.

@f0x
Of course they're using a domain with "ryona" in the name