is there like a concept that describes the pitfalls of ascribing improvements to a specific innovation, while it's really due to smaller changes that could've much better been implemented in the existing system?

Follow

someone noticed this once in the companies that tout blockchain as a great improvement, while the actual change was due to finally using a better specified data model, which would've worked even better without any blockchain garbage

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.