YIKES I knew the single . included in *some* of the template inclusion examples was important
because that passes the arguments to the included template
this syntax is fucking ridiculous
there's literally no way they could've made this more obtuse
@dumpsterqueer yeaaa
@f0x I also had a horrible time with the template just trying to write something very simple, so trying to do something more complex than just filling in a few variables? Oof
@dumpsterqueer oh I am *absolutely* not going to do anything more than variable filling here haha
@f0x don't fancy passing functions into your template? :P
@dumpsterqueer nope nope nope
@f0x I'll try it one day and get back to you :') it looks horrid and I delight in the grotesque
@f0x having fun? :P