Follow
fuchsiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
@katnjiapus@toot.site in classic stackoverflow fashion though, 3 answers down "no you don't need imagemagick at all, just use <small,neat,singlepurpose package>"
is imagemagick the new jquery
@katnjiapus@toot.site in classic stackoverflow fashion though, 3 answers down "no you don't need imagemagick at all, just use <small,neat,singlepurpose package>"
is imagemagick the new jquery
@f0x @katnjiapus I might argue ImageMagick was JQuery before JQuery. 😆
To be fair, it is magic if you can afford it as a dependency 😛