IRC admin gripe 

I wish Tor wasn't such an administrative burden on an IRC network.

Before the soapbox speaks up: it really is.

For a long time, Interlinked didn't filter Tor nodes. But we got flooding attacks originating from Tor nodes and we instituted it around 2009 (we've been around a long time, and I'm old as shit yes).

There is an answer. You set up a registration portal or request line (or people have to register without Tor, not ideal). Then set up a server as a hidden service (ideally), and DNSBL exemptions. Then you have to tell users to use SASL to login, or they'll hit the DNSBL and be kicked off. Virtually everyone using Tor winds up hitting the DNSBL because of this at least once.

Then you gotta deal with the Tor daemon flaking out on you, and keeping an eye on the whole thing and ensuring the house of cards doesn't fall down. And also monitor for abuse constantly.

All for what, 3 people who ever use the damn thing, who never stay anyway.

Why fucking bother?

IRC admin gripe 

@Elizafox I'm sorry you have to put up with that, from one netadmin to another

re: IRC admin gripe 

@elfi Well we decided "fuck that" and told the people who wanted it to pay for the costs cause yeah, not going through this nonsense again.

Follow

re: IRC admin gripe 

@Elizafox yeah, "fuck you pay me" is a powerful statement against entitlement like that

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.