I regularly see people trying to defend GIMP and particularly its name by going "GIMP has been making graphics on Linux so much better over the years, why would you make such a problem of such a small thing as the name and lose sight of the important things?"

And the thing that gets me is that, like, GIMP actually isn't even *good*. Krita has achieved vastly more progress in vastly less time than GIMP ever has, and is miles ahead of GIMP in terms of "letting people actually do graphics on Linux". This argument is so transparently bullshit!