Follow
FOSS, "AI"
You FOSS people who are cheering on LLMs and "open-source AI" do realize that you're actively chasing developers away from publishing under FOSS licenses, right? Because a license that excludes LLMs cannot be considered FOSS?
There are good reasons to have that requirement for a license to be considered FOSS, but the other side of that coin is that you *must* promptly address ethical abuses on a community level, and not fucking *embrace* them.
FOSS, "AI"
@joepie91 This seems to be an ideological failing of this industry; there is an assumption that all technology is an inherently neutral tool that can be used for "good" or "bad" whatever those mean.
the a desperate attempt to claw at and salvage this "innovation" for their definition of good are ignoring it's inherent flaws labeling the disgust of others as reactionary technophobia and "scepticism" to be dispelled.