Is there an #ADHD term for, uh, nominal priority.
Like, I decide I'm going to work on that specific thing with full expectation that I'll get repeatedly derailed.
But I will get derailed in that general direction.
@virtulis I don't know if there's a term for this, but I think this may be the same thing I do for software projects?
Where I break them up into lots of small parts that I develop as independent libraries simultaneously, so if I get distracted, I will probably get distracted towards a different part of the same goal. And it means that all of them take a very long time individually but there's a near-constant stream of *something* getting done.
@joepie91 I guess, but in my case it's even less organized.
I just decide "if I ever forget what I'm working on, it's that thing". Then I proceed to fix anything that annoys me until that thing is done. Which can take a month and that's okay and good result.
@virtulis Ah yeah, I recognize the more general form of this, which seems to be 'relieving pressure' - the way I've implemented this is the idea of "declaring a day wasted", where if I feel like I can't focus I immediately drop all obligations for that day and do whatever I feel like.
And often I end up magically being able to focus on the exact same thing I was already doing, just because I'm not pushing myself to do it anymore.
@joepie91 @virtulis this is way too real. I keep doing next to nothing for an entire workday and then at the end of the day I go "screw it, I'll do this small thing and then clock out" and I end up doing the entire day's worth of work in two hours but get off later than I anticipated
How do I get out of this cycle
@joepie91 yeah, that too.
But I guess the specific "one weird trick" I'm talking about is deciding beforehand on the answer to "Right, where was I?".
That's the whole thing. If I ever find myself wondering what I was going to do today, it's trying to automate print jobs on that stupid printer. If I don't, I'm probably doing something useful anyway.