warning regarding uspol and data archiving (2)
Also, more generally, consider that institutional organizations are *much* more vulnerable to hostile action than chaotic local collectives which do not have clear operators or representatives.
It pays to store a copy in some obscure organization that's difficult to figure out as an outsider, even if they don't have professional infrastructure to support it. Deliberate censorship is the bigger risk right now, not accidental data loss.
warning regarding uspol and data archiving (2)
@KuJoe That could certainly be a useful option here!
Garage may also be worth looking into, though it has much weaker protections against malicious nodes - it's more useful if you control all of the storage systems involved and just want to distribute the data among them.
warning regarding uspol and data archiving (2)
@joepie91 Thanks! I'll look into both. I've been looking into solutions where groups of individuals can pool their resources for a project like this and it seems like it's needed now more than ever.
@joepie91 Yes. Lots of copies, widely dispersed.
The Internet Archive is a great resource, but I agree that it's not one that should be relied upon as the sole "safe haven" for data. Because no place ever is.
If there's something you care about to preserve, even if the Internet Archive has a copy, then very strongly consider making a local copy yourself.
re: warning regarding uspol and data archiving (2)
@joepie91 i assume you're probably aware of this but fwiw archive team (the group currently mass-archiving usgov datasets) is a chaotic collective, the internet archive is just responsible for long-term data storage
warning regarding uspol and data archiving (2)
@joepie91 I think you were the one who told me about Tahoe-LAFS, I need to look into that again because it really did look promising when I played around with it.