Follow
@clarfonthey AFAIK for the license evaluation they consider the entirety of the codebase (including dependencies) so "other licenses" should already be covered, though it's been a while since I've looked at this in detail.
The maintenance/support status would certainly be useful information. I can see why they haven't done that yet - unlike license information, it's a moving target that changes over time and keeps changing in sometimes hard-to-track ways. I'm not sure that I consider that a good enough reason not to do it.
@joepie91 like this info is front and center and placed in a way that it stands as a warning to everyone who uses the app when most of the people using the app, imho, should not care about this bit specifically
@joepie91 that's fair
basically my biggest complaint here is that all the "anti-features" have equal weight, so actual anti-features (like depending on proprietary third parties) are at the same level of not being able to resell the app