So it seems that OWL 2 is essentially "a standard library of utilities for expressing complex RDF relationships" and if they'd actually *said* that anywhere it would've saved me an awful lot of time
@petrichor I assume it was because of a disagreement over whether it should be Web Ontology Language or Langage d'Ontologie Web and so they picked one that nobody would be happy with
@joepie91 Hah! I wish I'd been a fly on the wall at the committee meeting where they decided it would be UTC 😂