transphobic/racist rhetoric, sexual assault mention
A follow-up explaining what I mean, since someone asked me for clarification:
A frequent example is tone policing of marginalized folks; the discussion of "should this marginalized group [of which I am not a part] be allowed to speak loudly, accuse, or generalize - do their circumstances justify it?"
There's other cases too, like arguing "actually police aren't racist, it's just because of higher crime numbers" or the infamous trans bathroom 'debate'. Another example of a slightly different kind would be "but can you *prove* that that happened?" to people who got sexually assaulted.
Basically anything where people cannot accept that maybe marginalized folks know what they're doing, and that they might be right even if you don't immediately see how.
That's probably the easiest way to identify the problem - people refusing to just (provisionally) believe that marginalized folks are speaking the truth, and instead approaching it from an angle of "I cannot accept it to be true unless I can reason towards it from my own understanding".
Those are the sort of discussions that one just *shouldn't* have; instead one should be listening to marginalized folks, provisionally accept that they are speaking the truth, and gradually do the work *themselves* of untangling the reasons behind it.