@vy nice :) it's a pretty... touchy subject in the Photography World it seems though, even the wikipedia page(s) have a very subjective "this is bad bokeh" "this is good bokeh" where the good is just a completely smooth blur and that's pretty boring in my imo
@f0x Unfortunately, photography is full of people who do well enough to their own aesthetic taste and mutual approval, and misinterpret what has worked for them as a set of value-coded elements and rules. In reality, it's all about how you use it and what you do with it, and I would not trust the opinions of whatever fuckaboo decided to write on the wikipedia page