Show newer

Hey, fellow #Mastodon (and #fediverse) #admins:

I am working on my book about the fedi and would like to get a sense of what it costs to run your server per month.

Anyone willing to share numbers? (Feel free to do it via DM if you don't want it public). Please let me know your instance and how much it costs.

Boosts welcome!

When creating PDFs, avoid using "Print to PDF." A screen reader user may still be able to access the text of PDFs created this way, but heading structure, alternative text, and any other tag structure will be lost. Using "Save As" or "Export" can preserve these tags.

@researchfairy thus it is imperative that we clear it at any and all opportunity
to rub it in, until the marketing people catch wind of it

long, the web 

I have complicated feelings about the web. Do I think it's perfect? No, absolutely not. Do I think it could've gone differently, better, and end up with the same *positive* traits? I'm not so sure.

There's a lot of takes like "apps don't belong on the web" and "separation of concerns is bullshit" or conversely "separation of concerns is holy", but I think all of these are grossly oversimplified, and it is really a lot more complicated.

In practice, the web is essentially the only application development target that truly works cross-platform, almost regardless of what you use - and it didn't even try to be that originally! It just kind of grew that way.

Because as it turns out, there are very good practical reasons why people like putting apps on the web - the ability to seamlessly link between content-in-apps and content-on-sites being a good (but rarely mentioned) example.

Likewise, separation of concerns makes a lot of sense as a concept. The exact boundaries between the concerns might not be the ideal ones, but... are there better ones? And can those better ones universally stand the test of time better than the current ones?

Because it's easy to find a sensible separation of concerns for a particular application, but finding a sensible separation of concerns *for every project by anyone forever* is a whole lot more difficult! It's not without reason that many UI toolkits are adopting design choices from web-land.

Or consider HTML. Is it a bit annoying to work with? Sure. Is it optimal for sending over a network? Absolutely not.

But... would we ever have arrived at a 'participatory web' to begin with if thousands of teens weren't able to use their browser to look at and tinker with the completely human-readable source code of existing websites?

Was there ever a way we could have gotten to where we are today, other than through flawed-but-easily-accessible technology?

These are just some of the reasons that I think the many widespread "web is horrible" and "web is amazing" takes do a disservice to what the web has become, and the people involved in making it so.

Yes, I think there's plenty to criticize. But I don't think it's possible to capture all of this into a binary judgment of quality, and people trying to do so anyway makes it very difficult to discuss the topic with any nuance.

(repost omdat ik de taal verkeerd ingesteld had...)

Wanneer je de hoort praten over hoe ze dingen beter gaan maken "voor alle Nederlanders", hou dan in je achterhoofd hoe racistische framing werkt:

Palestinian poet, scholar, and librarian Mosab Abu Toha was beaten up by the Israeli army, his passports (including the American one) and all his documents taken away.

Mosab is the founder of the Edward Said library in Gaza. He's a National Book Critics Circle Award Finalist & Palestine Book Award Winner.

The army of thugs with access to billions of $ of Western money beat up a librarian.

@HannahCelsius typisch vind ik het ook dat mensen allerlei minderheden opnoemen en de gehandicapten daar niet tussen staan. Zag ik ook de laatste weken in veel verkiezingsprogramma's, en nu weer in veel van die solidariteitsoproepen. We bestaan nog steeds niet in het bewustzijn van veel mensen.

Zeg alsjeblieft niet de komende tijd: "Ach, het zal wel meevallen." Want het valt niet mee, het is de laatste jaren alleen maar erger geworden.

Alarm is nu. Nu is de tijd om arm in arm tegen de fascisten in te gaan.

Show thread

OpenAI Board: "You're fired!"

Altman: "Are you sure about that?"

OpenAI Board: "I apologize for the confusion in my previous answer. You are hired. We are fired."

... why does my NAS keep finding new ways to break constantly

:Trek:; billionaire mention 

@researchfairy i wonder how much of what we take as written history from the past 5000 years ago is just bad fan fiction

it's kinda funny. the corporate "metaverse" is sterile and boring, but the less boring one is completely unsellable. strange how some services work like that
Show thread

kimsufi's renewal emails are from validation-world, which sounds like a weird theme park

-- demon dog 🔥

CW: Disability, discrimination, mental health, corporate discrimination 

Honestly the worst thing about being disabled is that you're so used to pushing down your needs and being told that the thing that makes you special is actually all a bunch of "negative traits and things to improve on" really hits hardest that you realise this was all targeted, when they say "lazy and unmotivated" they mean disabled people.

They mean disability. Because that was the point of these words, they were always designed to shame people who were not neurotypical. And now they are used to shame people again, but now, we do it through paperwork, hiding behind pens and suits.

When they say "you can't just expect us to change everything for you" They mean the extra requirements to level the playing field, the reasonable adjustments that look, to them, like a nice easy rest. They expect you to be un-disabled eventually, even if they say they don't, they are hoping that it will become a non-issue eventually.

"You can't just expect people to help you with all your paperwork all the time that's lazy"
No, it's my disability. Remember how people used to discriminate against people with chronic fatigue and those who use wheelchairs? They called them lazy. Yeah.

It's always that when you boil it down. And the program of "performance management" is nothing more than targeted harassment. It's a threat, designed to make you aware that you are being watched, and that you will need to put extra effort in.

Of course as a disabled person, you don't actually have any extra effort to give. You borrow it from elsewhere, you drag yourself up the stairs. People think that's time from earlier or later but it's actually "the things I wanted to do in the active hours i might get". It is the exhaustion of doing the thing my brain isn't built to do.

Dishes, maybe. Art, perhaps cleaning, you improvise and give those up, and then you regret it, it makes you feel empty, so you make sure to make time for what must be done.

You're neurodivergent so these things aren't really negotiable, to do the job, you need to be healthy, to be healthy you need to support the bits you can't ignore like that! Why work otherwise? You draw a line. "My health first"

Then they ask you to put a bit more effort in.
You're being asked to put work first ahead of everything, now also including the proof required for performance management. This work isnt getting done, of course, because youre sacrificing your health for work that you cant focus on. this is now a threat to your income- if youre not working, how will you buy food to eat?! So you just skip lunch again (haha oopsie but times are hard and EVERYONE has to try harder!) You just try hard, so hard, every day that it destroys you, and they go "oh dear irresponsible of you to be destroyed"

You're not spending more time on things because you don't have it, you have your active hours and very little else. More effort eats at your life, and performance management pushes more of your brain to how much you're being marked as "not good enough" and "must improve" and "more effort" is needed. Your mental health degrades of course, your self-confidence, as you put "more effort" into work, you put less effort into yourself. Everything starts to drop into burnout, your boss turns up the heat by ignoring the terms in your plan, the few scraps you could muster that were actual real changes that help.

Your output drops. Your mood drops. Everything drops. The performance management team gets upset because you haven't been improving, not that you haven't been trying. That needle has been in the red for months, again, like you said you wouldn't do, but they've had you on a performance plan for months now trying to avoid a discrimination suit. They claim that they want to support you, but if you need something specific? Policy doesn't support that.

So they don't support you, they don't support your needs, they allow their systems to discriminate against you through apathy, and they simply wait for the paperwork to escort you out.

If your support plan has a potential end with dismissal, it isn't a support plan. It is a way for your company to fire you for being disabled. It is a way for the company to protect itself from the idea that it didn't try.

They enshrine their failure to engage with reality in administrative nuclear glass and pass down judgment from on-high. "We would not try to hurt you" the forked tongue whips through their teeth. "We are ssssimply making sssssure that we have written down every single thing that you have done in a negative persssspective, if only you had written down all of your acheivementssssss.
You say your disability is in organisation and recall? What a Ssssssshame, what an eassssy win."

And if we get mad about it? Hmph. That's gross misconduct. Easy win.

I ain't gonna let 'em get away with it. This far, no further.

Great, Firefox's dbus notifications broke again so now it's spamming me with its own custom notifications again

Een paar van mijn bespiegelingen op de recente verkiezingsuitslagen, op Doorbraak.eu:

"Nu de PVV met 37 zetels in de Tweede Kamer komt, kunnen we er niet langer meer omheen: extreem-rechts domineert het politieke landschap in Nederland. [...] Met name voor gemarginaliseerde groepen in onze samenleving zal dit aanzienlijke consequenties hebben. Tegelijkertijd moeten we niet doen alsof hier sprake is van een verschuiving in de politieke taal en verhoudingen: het Nederland van Rutte’s VVD wás in veel opzichten al extreem-rechts."

doorbraak.eu/nederland-was-al-

nlpol, spicy take 

I think it's a bad idea to call this a democratic outcome, actually. The 'democracy' in the Netherlands has been deteriorating for many years in many aspects:

- No functioning journalistic apparatus, journalists just publish any claim from politicians and government without any sort of checks
- Justice system is constantly being (deliberately) eroded, with legal support being increasingly unavailable to low-income folks, "reducing cases against the government" was an explicitly stated objective
- No functioning checks-and-balances on new legislative proposals; constitution-violating legislation is frequently passed and there are no consequences
- No effective mechanisms to mitigate propaganda at *any* level, including parliamentary debates themselves, moderation there has been broken for years
- Protests of any sort against the government are structurally repressed by police with violence, this has been going on for two decades at least

Considering all these things, how much of a democracy is there actually still left? Was this a democratic election, or was it the predictable result of a lengthy process of propaganda and outright lies that nothing was done against?

I think calling it a "democratic outcome" only serves to legitimize the result, when there are good reasons to believe that it's not (eg. policy polls show wildly different outcomes).

"Democracy" is about more than just being allowed to cast a vote and having those votes counted correctly.

... why is there only a *single* polyamory pride day? This doesn't make any sense

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.