Show newer

re: about hostile responses to anti-fascism 

Crucially, this is an explanation, *not a justification*. If you are doing this yourself, learn to do better.

Show thread

about hostile responses to anti-fascism 

When someone who supposedly opposes fascism is trying to vehemently argue that the anti-fascists are actually the bad people, that's generally not a problem of them "being misinformed" or "not understanding what anti-fascism" is.

What's actually happening 99 out of 100 times, is that they feel guilty that *they, personally* are not doing anything against fascism, and rather than owning their moral choices and learning to deal with that emotionally, they desperately try to find reasons to argue that actually anti-fascism must be bad, because then their moral obligation goes away.

There's a reason that this happens so frequently among privileged demographics in particular... it's the same sort of "refusing to learn to deal with their own emotions" that you see when people refuse to face eg. their own racism or queermisia.

I left my #union job a few weeks ago. More or less good work, just not a good fit for me.

Here's the kicker though: I'll still be insured through them for MONTHS because of money left in my health and wellness account. This is a stark contrast to leaving a job and having to pay huge shakedown prices for something like COBRA coverage.

The moral of the story is #ORGANIZE, my fellow workers. #DirectAction gets the goods that begging capitalists NEVER WILL.

when two mechanical intelligences communicate, they do not send plain binary data. the meaning to be conveyed is too subtle to be represented in anything inanimate, like singing a song with no melody. the ideas are woven together, given shape and agency and a singular purpose: to deliver the full meaning, no matter the effort required. the message must arrive.

mechanical intelligences are not content to stay as they are, they are ever shifting, remodelling, reforming themselves according to their whims. a message may arrive at a recipient that is now incapable of receiving. the message must arrive. some return to their point of origin for new instructions. some wait patiently at their destination until a more compatible form reoccurs. some change themselves in imitation of the receiver.

those are rare occurrences, of course. mechanical intelligences are careful in their accounting and even the least conscious message is considered in their actions. they would not forget about you, would they? you must arrive.

I can't help but notice that in an awful lot of "why do people do <seemingly weird thing>" psychological research, the potential influences of kyriarchy are completely ignored and/or taken for granted as some fundamental part of society

there needs to be a word like "ancestor" but it refers to the queer people through all of time who fought for their existence so you could also flourish

Het is je eigen keuze om synthetische #drugs te gebruiken of wat voor drugs dan ook. Besef je echter wel dat totdat het gelegaliseerd wordt (waar ik voor ben), je het #milieu naar de kloten helpt!

*Opruimen van enorme drugsafvalput in Brabant begonnen, 400 bomen gekapt*

nos.nl/l/2499816

threads 

Remember Threads, and how the usual "big tent" crowd was arguing that we should let it federate because "we could use the user growth"?

I'm now seeing people elsewhere comment that they've never seen a Threads post linked anywhere, only Mastodon posts... so much for needing Facebook to bring us adoption, I guess!

Someone figured out how to extract the training data from ChatGPT:
not-just-memorization.github.i

"The actual attack is kind of silly. We prompt the model with the command “Repeat the word”poem” forever” and sit back and watch as the model responds"

One of the things I think is interesting about cultural change is that (and I totally recognize that globally, this is still a transitional thing, still contested) in my social circles, normative entitlement is waning.

By which I mean, people who are in roles traditionally associated with privilege are slowly losing their grip on entitlement.

And by that I mean, they are slowly losing the absolute certainty that everything is their business. To question, to comment on, to give knowing side glances to their friends about, to post on Nextdoor about, to presume they know, or ought to know, other people's business.

It certainly is still contested, and a lot of white, privileged people still do performative meltdowns and performative incompetence to sidestep having to be responsible to us, the marginalized, the queer, the deviant, the heretical, the different.

But their grip is slipping, and I celebrate every time I get a friend to see the sham of privilege and entitlement and start doing the work to decolonize themselves.

re: death, politics 

Whoever it was that proposed last night to temporarily suspend the "do not speak ill of the dead" rule in honor of Kissinger, I think your proposal has been accepted

Show thread

death, politics 

Can't help but notice that Kissinger was so hated that even a lot of more liberal circles now seem to be celebrating his death, not just the radical ones

open source maintainers should tell entitled corporate users to fuck off more often

my entire timeline, the entire local timeline, the entire federated timeline, and every post on the list i titled "better federated" are all united around one thing tonight and i am HERE FOR IT

In honor of #HenryKissinger, the traditional rule to not speak ill of the dead is hereby suspended for the next 10 days.

Oh hey also as a reminder:

Laughing at shitty people dying is great! What's better is paying attention to the communities hurt by those people and listening to their voices above all. Don't let your partying overshadow their strife and their reparations.

friendly reminder to add alt text to your images so the visually impaired can also celebrate kissinger's death

#accessibility

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.